Missing the Train Completely

Here’s a quaint post I wrote in 2006:

2010

That’s when Spitzer’s up for re-election.

I read this very thoughtful post over at NYCO’s blog and I, too, thought throughout 2005 that this year’s election would be a watershed moment for upstate and western New York. I set up a whole separate category for those posts as soon as I switched to Wordpress in April 2005, and had already endorsed Spitzer when I was still on my blogger site.

I started focusing on local and state issues soon after the first Brennan Center report on state government was released(pdf), outlining Albany’s dysfunction. When I discovered other upstate bloggers also posting about their frustration with Albany and its ill effect on the upstate economy, I was heartened by it because I learned that while the details of upstate’s problems may differ, Albany always came back as being a significant factor in bringing those problems about. Our legislators were mostly emasculated rubber stampers. Three men in a room act as the politburo, with lobbyists and unions as the party cadres.

So, was the election of 2006 the watershed moment I’d hoped it’d be? Time will tell.

People are very skeptical about Eliot Spitzer, which is understandable in a place that has an absolute right to its cynicism. I’m setting aside my skepticism for hope. As early as March 2005 I had attended my first local Spitzer event, and when he spoke about upstate, he got it. He understood that the old way of doing things was the problem. That “day one, everything changes” line was custom-designed for upstate New York.

Because the people downstate don’t generally give two thoughts about Albany and its politics. New York City is the political and economic engine driving everything south of Poughkeepsie where most of the state’s population lives. New York’s local news channels focus on tri-state goings on, not Albany. Upstate is different. Since government is the chief employer now in most of the big upstate cities, people are more keenly aware of what goes on in Albany and local politics.

I have not once heard someone say that Spitzer was a poor or ineffective Attorney General. I have never heard a criticism of him except that he has sometimes bullied Wall Street firms to pony up a settlement rather than take them to court. Given that 90% or more of most litigation is resolved prior to trial, that’s hardly surprising. What Spitzer did, though, is enforce regulations and statutes when the federal government wouldn’t. That enforcement inured to the benefit of consumers over powerful entities that were playing fast and loose with the law.

We’ve traded in a feckless windvane of a Governor for one who is not afraid to make waves and take on entrenched, powerful interests.

Skeptics point to Spitzer’s collection of endorsements and contributions from unions and scoff at the notion that Spitzer would bite the hands that fed him. But he got out of the gate so fast and so far ahead, that one could argue that he didn’t need them as much as they need him. Had it been a close race where he would have required heavy union turnout efforts to pull it over the top, that’d be a different story. But it wasn’t, and he didn’t.

Spitzer’s mandate is strong enough that he can wield it effectively against Albany legislators who are stuck in the muddy status quo and refuse to reform. Strengthening committees. Conference committees. Bringing bills to the floor for votes. Equal funding for all legislators. Loosening the Assembly speaker’s and Senate president’s grip on legislation. This is Albany’s unfinished business.

I am hopeful that Spitzer can push through the sorts of desperately needed reforms which would finally restore democracy to New York State government. With that restoration, along with comprehensive reform of state authorities, upstate New York could finally be on the path towards economic prosperity. If the cost of government is lowered and policies are fair and our interests are given a voice, we can make great strides in the coming years. If government is no longer the only local growth industry, but we can instead encourage the growth, advent, and an influx of private industry, we can then attain that Buffalo renaissance for which we all strive.

By 2010, we’ll know if that restoration has arrived, is on its way, or hasn’t even left the station.

Let’s make sure that all are aboard that train as we speak.

It’s now 2008. Spitzer has been in office for what, 14 months?

Let’s be frank. The train hasn’t left the station.

It hasn’t reached the station, and all the passengers are stuck in their cars trying to get to the station. They’re in mind-blowing traffic on the Cross-Bronx Expressway right before a Yankee game.

del.icio.us Reddit Slashdot Digg Facebook Technorati Google StumbleUpon Yahoo Bloglines

2 Responses to “Missing the Train Completely”

  1.  

    it's all about the pin Says:

    At least he wore a lapel pin.
    Silda’s scarf is like a NY motiff if you look closely.
    Caligula falls

  2.  

    Bill Altreuter Says:

    Albany’s problem is structural. The rules under which the Legislature does business prevent the rank and file membership of the majority party in each house from stepping out of line with leadership, and the minority party members are completely marginalized. A great deal of the ordinary business that gets done is performed by appointed commissions– like the Thruway Authority, for example– that operate outside of the public view, with no public accountability.

    I think Spitzer understood that this was a model that had to change, and I think he was working towards that. As ineffective as he was, his organization was quietly shifting the power balance in the State Senate– it is likely that the Democrats would have had control after the next election, and that might have enabled him to start making some of the changes that need to be made. I do not think that David Patterson will be able to accomplish these things. I suspect that Patterson is not inclined towards change– he is a creature of the New York State Legislature. That culture is one where he is comfortable operating, and it seems unlikely to me that he will be inclined to alter that. Even if he is, he doesn’t have a lot of political capital. What made Spitzer credible as an agent of change was that he obviously didn’t care about the political status quo. There are a lot of reasons people hated him– he was a prick, for one thing (I’d forgotten how gratuitously cruel he was to Hevisi, for example)– but the main reason he engendered so much dislike was that he was not playing the Albany game by the rules everybody else in Albany was comfortable with.

    Poor son of a bitch. His wife and family hate him, if he has a friend in the world it would be headline news, and even the $5,000 dollar hookers hate him for screwing up and getting them busted.

    It is hard to see Patterson getting re-elected, although it is early days. I voted for Tom Souzzi last time, and would do it again. Maybe Bloomberg will take a whack at it– he stands enough outside the system to be able to accomplish the necessary. Meanwhile, roads will crumble, schools will decline, population will migrate, the Sabres will miss the playoffs, and the Bills quarterback situation will remain unsettled.

Got something to say? Drop it here.

WNYM seeks to provide a forum for snarky opinions and open discussion. However, we do need to have some ground rules around this joint. In order to make our comments useful and interesting, the following guidelines have been established for comment users. In short; don't act like a libelous or hate-filled tool and we'll get along just fine.